Selected MLCC part numbers across nine Murata product series are reportedly being discontinued, giving customers more than two years to qualify alternatives while highlighting a broader shift in global MLCC capacity allocation.
Murata Manufacturing is reportedly optimizing part of its multilayer ceramic capacitor (MLCC) portfolio as the passive component industry responds to changing demand and production priorities.
According to a recent customer notification circulating in the supply chain, selected part numbers within nine MLCC series — GRM, GRJ, GRT, GXM, GXT, GCM, GCJ, GCG and ZRA — are scheduled for discontinuation. The affected products span a range of applications, including consumer electronics, industrial equipment and automotive systems. Some of the affected series also address specialized requirements such as soft termination and automotive applications.
The reported timeline provides customers with a relatively long transition period. Customers are expected to complete the relevant review and confirmation by December 31, 2027, with the final order date set for March 31, 2028 and the final shipment date set for March 31, 2029.
Importantly, this should not be interpreted as Murata exiting the MLCC business. Murata continues to maintain a broad ceramic capacitor portfolio, including products for automotive, high-reliability and high-capacitance applications. The reported adjustment is better understood as a portfolio and capacity optimization involving selected part numbers, rather than a withdrawal from MLCC manufacturing.
Potential Impact on the Global MLCC Supply Chain
The significance of the move lies less in the absolute volume of discontinued products than in what it says about the direction of the MLCC market.
MLCC manufacturers are increasingly allocating production capacity toward applications with higher technical requirements and stronger growth prospects. AI servers, data-center infrastructure, automotive electronics, high-performance computing and other power-intensive systems require large numbers of high-capacitance, high-reliability and increasingly compact MLCCs. Industry analysis has already pointed to a growing capacity competition between advanced products and more mature general-purpose applications.
Murata's reported product adjustment therefore has the potential to create specification-level supply gaps, rather than a broad shortage of MLCCs. Customers using the affected part numbers may need to qualify alternatives from other manufacturers, but the available options will vary considerably by specification and application.
The global competitive landscape includes Samsung Electro-Mechanics, TDK, Taiyo Yuden, Yageo, Walsin Technology and other regional manufacturers, as well as a growing number of Chinese MLCC producers. Different suppliers have different strengths across consumer, industrial, automotive, high-reliability and high-capacitance products. Recent market analysis also indicates that Murata and Samsung remain particularly important in advanced MLCCs, while TDK, Taiyo Yuden and Taiwanese suppliers cover significant portions of the broader market.
However, a manufacturer having a similar MLCC product does not automatically mean that it can serve as a drop-in replacement. Electrical characteristics, case size, dielectric, capacitance tolerance, rated voltage, temperature characteristics, DC-bias behavior, termination structure and reliability requirements all need to be evaluated.
This is particularly important for automotive applications. A replacement may require additional qualification and reliability testing before it can enter volume production. As a result, the potential redistribution of Murata orders is likely to occur gradually rather than as an immediate one-for-one transfer.
For manufacturers in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and mainland China, the development may create opportunities in different segments. Taiwanese suppliers are frequently cited as potential beneficiaries for mature and mainstream specifications, while Japanese and Korean manufacturers remain important competitors in higher-performance and automotive applications. Chinese manufacturers may also gain opportunities where their specifications, qualification status, capacity and cost structure meet customer requirements. The outcome, however, will ultimately depend on individual part numbers and customer approvals rather than geography alone.
What Does the Change Mean for End Customers?
For OEMs, EMS providers and equipment manufacturers, the key issue is lifecycle continuity.
Customers should not wait until the final order date to begin reviewing affected components. A practical first step is to identify all BOMs containing the affected Murata part numbers and determine the remaining production and service requirements.
The next step is to evaluate potential alternatives. Depending on the application, customers may consider a Murata replacement part, an equivalent product from another qualified manufacturer, or a redesign where a direct equivalent is unavailable.
For standard consumer and commercial electronics, qualification may be relatively straightforward if the electrical and mechanical specifications are sufficiently close. For automotive, industrial and other long-life applications, the process can be significantly more demanding. A change in MLCC supplier may require engineering evaluation, reliability testing, customer approval and, in some cases, formal requalification.
Inventory planning is another consideration. Customers may decide to place a final-time buy before the March 2028 order deadline, but such purchases need to be balanced against minimum order quantities, packaging requirements, storage conditions, product shelf life and the expected service life of the end product.
The long transition window provides an opportunity to avoid emergency sourcing — but only if alternative-source evaluation begins early.
What Could Happen to MLCC Pricing and Lead Times?
The EOL announcement also comes at a time when the broader MLCC market is experiencing changing supply-demand dynamics.
AI infrastructure is increasing demand for high-end MLCCs, while several major manufacturers are also adjusting pricing and capacity allocation. Samsung Electro-Mechanics, for example, has been reported to raise prices for certain MLCC products amid strong demand and capacity constraints, while Taiyo Yuden has also adjusted pricing in 2026.
This does not necessarily mean that all MLCC prices will rise sharply. Instead, the market may become increasingly segmented: high-end and application-specific MLCCs could face tighter capacity, while mature specifications may see greater competition among alternative suppliers.
For buyers, this makes part-level market monitoring more important than relying on broad MLCC supply or pricing trends.
How Futuretech Can Support Customers
For customers affected by the Murata product-line adjustment, Futuretech Components can provide support across global sourcing, equivalent-part evaluation and lifecycle planning.
As an electronic component distributor, Futuretech can help identify affected part numbers, check available inventory across global sources, and evaluate potential alternatives based on the customer's technical and commercial requirements.
Where a direct replacement is not available, our team can assist with Equivalent Parts sourcing by comparing key specifications and identifying potential manufacturers across different regions. For customers facing longer qualification cycles, Futuretech can also support buffer-stock planning, shortage sourcing and end-of-life inventory strategies.
Quality is another important part of the transition. Alternative components should be evaluated not only on price and availability, but also on authenticity, traceability, packaging condition and compliance with the customer's requirements. Futuretech's quality process and in-house QC capabilities can support incoming inspection and verification before delivery.
With final orders currently scheduled for March 2028 and final shipments extending to March 2029, customers still have time to develop a controlled transition plan. Starting the review early can give engineering and procurement teams more options — and reduce the risk of being forced into a last-minute replacement decision.
软雅黑;">
